σμimplied vol · KKmax(S−K,0)udβρᵢⱼfat tailsPnL · drawdownyield · TdSₜ = μSₜ dt + σSₜ dWₜC = S·N(d₁) − K·e⁻ʳᵀ·N(d₂)σₚ² = wᵀΣwd₁ = [ln(S/K) + (r + σ²⁄2)T] ⁄ σ√T∂V/∂t + ½σ²S²·∂²V/∂S² + rS·∂V/∂S − rV = 0Sharpe = (Rₚ − R_f) ⁄ σₚVaR₉₉ = μ − 2.33σρ = Cov(X,Y) ⁄ σₓσᵧE[Rₚ] = Σ wᵢ·E[Rᵢ]φ(x) = e^(−x²/2) ⁄ √2πE[Rᵢ] = R_f + βᵢ(E[Rₘ] − R_f)dXₜ = θ(μ − Xₜ)dt + σ dWₜσ²ₜ = ω + α·ε²ₜ₋₁ + β·σ²ₜ₋₁C − P = S − K·e⁻ʳᵀΔ = ∂V/∂S Γ = ∂²V/∂S²p = (e^(rΔt) − d) ⁄ (u − d)rₜ = ln(Pₜ ⁄ Pₜ₋₁)E[Xₜ₊₁ | ℱₜ] = Xₜf* = (bp − q) ⁄ bz = (x − μ) ⁄ σP(N=k) = λᵏe^(−λ) ⁄ k!Θ = −∂V/∂Tν = S·φ(d₁)·√Tmin wᵀΣw s.t. wᵀμ = μ*∫Σ∂∞λ
σμimplied vol · KKmax(S−K,0)udβρᵢⱼfat tailsPnL · drawdownyield · TdSₜ = μSₜ dt + σSₜ dWₜC = S·N(d₁) − K·e⁻ʳᵀ·N(d₂)σₚ² = wᵀΣwd₁ = [ln(S/K) + (r + σ²⁄2)T] ⁄ σ√T∂V/∂t + ½σ²S²·∂²V/∂S² + rS·∂V/∂S − rV = 0Sharpe = (Rₚ − R_f) ⁄ σₚVaR₉₉ = μ − 2.33σρ = Cov(X,Y) ⁄ σₓσᵧE[Rₚ] = Σ wᵢ·E[Rᵢ]φ(x) = e^(−x²/2) ⁄ √2πE[Rᵢ] = R_f + βᵢ(E[Rₘ] − R_f)dXₜ = θ(μ − Xₜ)dt + σ dWₜσ²ₜ = ω + α·ε²ₜ₋₁ + β·σ²ₜ₋₁C − P = S − K·e⁻ʳᵀΔ = ∂V/∂S Γ = ∂²V/∂S²p = (e^(rΔt) − d) ⁄ (u − d)rₜ = ln(Pₜ ⁄ Pₜ₋₁)E[Xₜ₊₁ | ℱₜ] = Xₜf* = (bp − q) ⁄ bz = (x − μ) ⁄ σP(N=k) = λᵏe^(−λ) ⁄ k!Θ = −∂V/∂Tν = S·φ(d₁)·√Tmin wᵀΣw s.t. wᵀμ = μ*∫Σ∂∞λ
uantCraft AcademySkills
Ctrl K
AO
+1.2k Learners
LoginJoin ↗
Skills
AO
+1.2k Learners
Login
  • English
  • Français
  • Español
  • العربية
  • Português
  • Deutsch
  • 日本語
  • 中文
Python skill›Module 11 · Production systems & frontier models›Topic 11.8·~1 hr 30 minExpert

Local volatility

Skill positionModule 11 of 11 · Topic 8 of 13
11.8 Local volatility
—Lab score— / 100Total XP—Streak—

One volatility for every strike and time

Black-Scholes prices a call with one volatility, yet the market quotes a different implied volatility for every strike and maturity. The local volatility model reproduces all those prices at once by letting the volatility depend on the price level and the time, sigma(S, t), while keeping a single source of randomness. Bruno Dupire showed in 1994 that this function is not a guess: it is determined by the surface of call prices C(K, T) through a formula, so the market's option prices can be turned directly into a model for pricing exotic options consistently with them.

# What "one volatility" means: a call priced with Black-Scholes at three strikes, all with the same sigma
import math

def norm_cdf(x):
    return 0.5 * (1 + math.erf(x / math.sqrt(2)))

def bs_call(s, k, t, r, q, sigma):
    d1 = (math.log(s / k) + (r - q + sigma ** 2 / 2) * t) / (sigma * math.sqrt(t))
    d2 = d1 - sigma * math.sqrt(t)
    return s * math.exp(-q * t) * norm_cdf(d1) - k * math.exp(-r * t) * norm_cdf(d2)

for k in (90, 100, 110):
    print(k, round(bs_call(100.0, k, 1.0, 0.03, 0.01, 0.2), 4))      # 90 14.6592   100 8.8273   110 4.8947   one sigma, three different prices

Dupire's formula

Dupire's formula expresses the local variance with three derivatives of the call-price surface: sigma_loc^2(K, T) = (dC/dT + (r - q) * K * dC/dK + q * C) / (0.5 * K^2 * d2C/dK2). The numerator contains the time slope of prices (it must be non-negative, otherwise a longer option is cheaper than a shorter one: a calendar arbitrage) and the denominator the butterfly d2C/dK2, proportional to the market's implied probability density of the price, which must be positive. With real quotes, which are noisy and sparse, the derivatives are taken by finite differences on a smoothed surface: (f(x+h) - f(x-h)) / (2h) for the first derivative and (f(x+h) - 2 f(x) + f(x-h)) / h^2 for the second. A noisy surface gives wild local volatilities, so smoothing the implied-volatility surface first is standard practice.

# Dupire's formula recovers a constant volatility from Black-Scholes prices (finite differences on the price surface)
import math

def norm_cdf(x):
    return 0.5 * (1 + math.erf(x / math.sqrt(2)))

def bs_call(s, k, t, r, q, sigma):
    d1 = (math.log(s / k) + (r - q + sigma ** 2 / 2) * t) / (sigma * math.sqrt(t))
    return s * math.exp(-q * t) * norm_cdf(d1) - k * math.exp(-r * t) * norm_cdf(d1 - sigma * math.sqrt(t))

def local_variance(call, dc_dt, dc_dk, d2c_dk2, strike, r, q):
    return (dc_dt + (r - q) * strike * dc_dk + q * call) / (0.5 * strike ** 2 * d2c_dk2)

s, k, t, r, q, sigma = 100.0, 105.0, 1.0, 0.03, 0.01, 0.2
hk, ht = 0.5, 0.002
c = bs_call(s, k, t, r, q, sigma)
dc_dt = (bs_call(s, k, t + ht, r, q, sigma) - bs_call(s, k, t - ht, r, q, sigma)) / (2 * ht)
dc_dk = (bs_call(s, k + hk, t, r, q, sigma) - bs_call(s, k - hk, t, r, q, sigma)) / (2 * hk)
d2c_dk2 = (bs_call(s, k + hk, t, r, q, sigma) - 2 * c + bs_call(s, k - hk, t, r, q, sigma)) / hk ** 2
print(round(math.sqrt(local_variance(c, dc_dt, dc_dk, d2c_dk2, k, r, q)), 3))        # 0.2   the constant volatility comes back

Using the surface in a simulation

To simulate, tabulate sigma_loc on a grid of prices (for each time slice) and look it up at the current price at every step, interpolating linearly between grid points and holding the end values flat beyond the grid. One step is then the usual log-Euler move with that volatility, S * exp((mu - sigma^2/2) dt + sigma sqrt(dt) dz). Compared with Heston, local volatility fits today's option prices exactly by construction, but its forward smile dynamics are unrealistic (the skew flattens as time passes), which matters for products sensitive to the future smile. Many desks therefore use stochastic-local volatility, a blend of the two.

# A lookup on a strike grid (linear inside, flat outside) and one simulation step with the volatility it returns
import math

def lookup_local_vol(strikes, vols, k):
    if k <= strikes[0]:
        return vols[0]
    if k >= strikes[-1]:
        return vols[-1]
    for i in range(1, len(strikes)):
        if k <= strikes[i]:
            weight = (k - strikes[i - 1]) / (strikes[i] - strikes[i - 1])
            return vols[i - 1] + weight * (vols[i] - vols[i - 1])

strikes, vols = [90.0, 100.0, 110.0], [0.25, 0.20, 0.18]
print(lookup_local_vol(strikes, vols, 95.0), round(lookup_local_vol(strikes, vols, 105.0), 4), lookup_local_vol(strikes, vols, 200.0))      # 0.225 0.19 0.18

s = 100.0
sigma = lookup_local_vol(strikes, vols, s)
print(round(s * math.exp((0.05 - sigma ** 2 / 2) * (1 / 252) + sigma * math.sqrt(1 / 252) * 0.5), 4))       # 100.6439
# A calendar arbitrage shows up as a negative numerator: a longer option priced below a shorter one
def numerator(call, dc_dt, dc_dk, strike, r, q):
    return dc_dt + (r - q) * strike * dc_dk + q * call

print(round(numerator(10.0, 1.2, -0.45, 100.0, 0.03, 0.01), 6))           # 0.4     prices rise with maturity: a valid local variance
print(numerator(10.0, -2.0, -0.45, 100.0, 0.03, 0.01) < 0)                # True    prices fall with maturity: no model can fit this
A perfect fit is not a perfect modelBecause local volatility is read off the prices, it reproduces them by construction, including their noise and any arbitrage in the quotes. Check that the surface is arbitrage-free before using Dupire (non-negative butterfly and calendar spreads), cap and floor the resulting volatilities, and test the simulated prices against the vanilla options you started from. A model that matches today perfectly can still hedge badly tomorrow, since its idea of how the smile moves is simplistic.
  • Local volatility sigma(S, t) reproduces the whole call-price surface with one source of randomness; Dupire's formula gives it directly from the prices.
  • Dupire: (dC/dT + (r - q) K dC/dK + q C) / (0.5 K^2 d2C/dK2); take the derivatives by finite differences on a smoothed, arbitrage-free surface.
  • Simulate by looking up sigma_loc at the current price each step; a perfect fit today does not guarantee realistic smile dynamics tomorrow.

Next up: the SABR model, a stochastic-volatility model with a closed-form smile.

Lab · what's graded

  • Differentiate numerically with finite_difference25 pts
  • Apply Dupire's formula in local_variance25 pts
  • Read the surface with lookup_local_vol25 pts
  • Simulate a step with local_vol_step25 pts
Explorer · lab-137-1
▾ lab-137-1
…
bash · in-browser
learner@quantcraft:~/lab-137-1$
Python not loaded yetPythonLn 1, Col 1Spaces: 4UTF-8

Reset this topic?

Everything in lab-137-1 goes back to the starter files and the terminal is cleared. Your current solution will be lost — this can't be undone.

Will be reset
  • main.py → starter code
  • Terminal history and test output
  • Unsubmitted changes
Will be kept
  • Best lab score
  • Your XP and streak
  • Lecture progress and notes

Log in to run your code.

Every lecture is free to read. Create an account or log in to run code, run tests and submit this lab.

  • In-browser IDE with a bash terminal — nothing to install
  • Instant grading, XP and your place on the skill
Create an accountLog in
OR
Continue with GitHub